Trump administration says “standards set too high.”

The Trump administration on Monday announced that it would revise tough mileage-per-gallon fuel standards for cars and light trucks, saying the rules agreed to during President Obama’s time in office were “not appropriate,” reported the USA Today.

“The Obama administration’s determination was wrong,” said Scott Pruitt, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Obama’s EPA cut the midterm evaluation process short with politically charged expediency, made assumptions about the standards that didn’t comport with reality, and set the standards too high.”

Pruitt did not say precisely when new standards would be set.

The decision, while expected, means several states, led by California, will likely press courts to allow them to keep tougher standards in place, which could force automakers to produce different cars for sale in different areas. Meanwhile, environmentalists argue that any rollback will hurt human health and exacerbate climate change.

“The Trump administration’s decision will take America backward by jeopardizing successful safeguards that are working to clean our air, save drivers money at the pump and drive technological innovation that creates jobs,” said Luke Tonachel, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Clean Vehicles and Fuels Project. “The American public overwhelmingly supports strong vehicle standards.”

Automakers, state officials, environmentalists and federal regulators had agreed back in 2012 to increase fuel efficiency standards to average 34.5 mpg by 2016 across the fleet of American cars and trucks with the figure then to grow to 54.5 mpg by 2025.

But that process called for a so-called midterm review, during which time automakers and others wanted the greater number to be revisited. Before Obama left office in early 2017, the EPA issued a ruling keeping the higher number in place — a decision that President Trump made clear last year he intended to revisit.

Pruitt said Monday that his agency’s new midterm evaluation determined that the standards needed to be revised, though he didn’t make any suggestions as to what would be an appropriate new standard to be set in the future.

CSD Daily, Fuel & Gas, Industry News